Field X Naming vs Storage 1283 PostsBucklash 7 years ago3Topic Hi Folks FIELD X: Does it matter if the field name and the storage do not match? Is this good Example:Field Name: 'field_to_repeat'Field Type: TextStorage: Custom | Article | field_x[field]Field Name: 'field_x_repeats_fields'Field Type: Field XStorage: Custom | Article | field_xOr is this best: Field Name: 'field_to_repeat' Field Type: TextStorage: Custom | Article | field_x_repeats_fields[field_to_repeat]Field Name: 'field_x_repeats_fields' Field Type: Field XStorage: Custom | Article | field_x_repeats_fieldsIs there any difference i.e. in searches, or certain things that certain plugins etc might be expecting?ThanksJon 4229 PostsKadministrator 7 years ago2Level 1Hi,I would say try it if there is any difference :) Test it with normal search type and one with search generic field, those are the most problematic things. 1283 PostsBucklash 7 years ago1Level 2Hi KlasWell, I do have field names different to storage and it all seems to be working fine.Just paranoia takes over sometimes :) 1283 PostsBucklash 7 years ago0Level 3Hi again...... Well, seeing as the data that gets stored is field_name::field_x_name rather than field_storage_name::fieldx_storage_nameso there is absolutely no benefit in having storage different to the name....